Current Distractions, May 2016 Edition

I'm not going to lie, this month has kicked my ass and I anticipate that the tough times aren't over yet. On the plus side, the weather's been really really nice, and I've slowly been sorting out my yard. Maybe at the end of next month I'll have a photo to show you of the portulaca that I'm attempting to grow from seed. Fingers crossed.

Counting

The 2016 Census is happening in Canada right now. Last census, five years ago, I was living in a small apartment by myself. Now I own my own place and live with my sister. Next time? Who knows!

Exercising

After months and/or years of complaining about how hard it is for me to do the kinds of exercise that I actually stick with, I've been biking and swimming a ton this month! Back when I was unemployed and starting this blog, I used this program to work my way up to swimming a mile continuously. I'm only on the second week of the program right now, but my eventual goal is to swim 1500m in 30 minutes. We'll see how it goes.

Watching

I watched more tv than I realized this month, including:
  • Brooklyn 99 Season 3
  • Bloodline Season 1
  • Better Call Saul Season 1
I also didn't realize that all of these shows started with Bs. Reading I've been keeping pace on my Top 100/Random reading (I know, I can't believe it either), but I've taken a couple of side quests:

Board Members: Christopher Cerf

Does anyone even remember the last time I did one of these? Here's a hint: it was just over four years ago. I actually did have a draft for this guy created years ago, but couldn't find enough information about him online at the time, so put off finishing it. Anyway, a quick reminder that this is an extremely cursory survey of this person's life, just like the previous bios.

Christopher Cerf | Two Hectobooks
Image borrowed from the Muppet Wiki

Name: Christopher Cerf

Born: August 19, 1941
Died: Still alive!
Country of Origin/Main Residence: United States

Sex: Male
Sexual Orientation: Hetero
Married?: Yes: Geneviève Charbin, 1972? (divorced at some point—the linked article is solid gold); Katherine Vaz, 2015
Children?: No
Education: something at Harvard
Religion: Jewish/Roman Catholic

Literary Awards: None I could find, but he's won some Grammys and Emmys

Life:
Christopher Cerf was born in, I'm guessing, New York, to a Roman Catholic mother and Jewish father, the latter of which was one of the co-founders of Random House. They were very much a media family.  Cerf went to Harvard College and then worked as an editor for a time at Random House.

From there, things get interesting, and I'm officially considering him responsible for any of the fun that's ended up on The List until I hear otherwise. Beginning in 1970 (the first season), Cerf contributed music and lyrics to Sesame Street (!) and multiple other television shows. He appears to be just generally awesome at and invested in children's tv programming, and has notably objected to the use of his work as a torture device, which is a good side to be on.

Cerf also edited the National Lampoon in its early days, and many of his authorial works are satirical, although I'm a bit skeptical about their quality based on some of the titles listed on the wiki page.  I'm very ok with the fact that he doesn't seem to be a stuffy literary novelist, however.

Sources: whatever I've linked within the post and also wikipedia

What I'm Reading: Live Alone and Like It by Marjorie Hillis

Live Alone and Like It by Marjorie Hillis | Two Hectobooks

I'll dispense with the disclaimer right away: this book is from 1936 and it is not perfect in terms of modern values by any stretch of the imagination. When I was looking for the image to include here, I found this Captain Awkward post, which goes way more in depth about things and critiques it more than I'm about to do.

Because the fact is, I loved this.

So, I keep my love life off of the blog for the most part, for a lot of reasons. I've alluded to past relationship experience a few times, but that's about it. Believe it or not, I've actually dated a few people since I started this project. The internet seems to really like the confessional style, so maybe I'd have a whole lot more readers right now if I did write about my romantic entanglements, but again, I'm just not interested in doing so. But in case that's what you've been waiting for all this time, I'll say this much: recently I've had cause to experience some extra agony about my situation. I'm not living alone just yet, but I will be soon. I have lived alone in the past, and I've loved it! It's tough being the "extra woman," though, and some times are tougher than others, and I've been going through one of those tough times. I've been sulking and feeling sorry for myself a lot.

Marjorie Hillis, writing 80 years ago, gave me exactly the kick in the ass that I needed.

Live Alone and Like It is precisely what it says on the tin. Hillis's premise is basically that rather than being woebegone and mopey, one must create one's own enjoyment. Don't be sad that no one is inviting you out; invite yourself out instead. Get busy doing things that you want to do, and spoil yourself as often as possible. I really can't stress enough how this is exactly the message I needed right now. I can't implement all of it right away, but it's given me a lot to think about. I've never read an old self-help book like this before, and I really really loved the sassy but understanding tone of it.

I got this book from the library and I need to own my own copy for the inevitable time in the future when I'll need its slap upside the head again, in case anyone is looking for gift ideas for me.

For now, here are some samples:

It's a good idea, first of all, to get over the notion (if you have it) that your particular situation is a little worse than anyone else's. This point of view has been experienced by every individual the world over at one time of another, except perhaps those who will experience it next year.

As to the recipes, you can of course, get a good book and follow it. But anybody ought to be able to master the recipes for Martinis, Manhattans, and Old-Fashioneds without undue strain. Having mastered them, do not try to improve on them. You can't. This is not a field in which to use your imagination. Don't think, either, that it would be nice to have some unfamiliar cocktail for variety. Your guests won't agree with you. Worse, even, than the woman who puts marshmallows in a salad is the one who goes in for fancy cocktails.

2016 Reading Plans

Once again I've made it nearly halfway through the year before posting my 2016 reading goals. However, to be honest, this year's goal is the same as last year's: read my own books that I haven't read yet. I'll be crossing off the books that I listed last year but have since read, and adding new ones. This time the order is sorta random. I've got 13 books to go, in comparison with last year's 31, and given my actual efforts to get through this list lately, I'm pretty confident that I'll manage it.


  1. Othello by William Shakespeare.
  2. Shop Class as Soulcraft by Matthew B. Crawford. Still need some time before I'll be ready to jump into this one.
  3. Housekeeping by Marilynne Robinson. Random review coming!
  4. Q-In-Law by Peter David. (This isn't in the photo because it's on my bedside table waiting for me to start it.
  5. The Fractal Prince by Hannu Rajaniemi.
  6. Garden in the Wind/Enchanted Summer by Gabrielle Roy.
  7. The Stone Angel by Margaret Laurence.
  8. Living and Party Going by Henry Green. I didn't actually read these books, I just got rid of them.
  9. Wonderbook by Jeff Vandermeer.
  10. Walden by Henry David Thoreau.
  11. Walden Two by B. F. Skinner.
  12. Joe Hill by Wallace Stegner. I got this at the used bookstore, for some reason skipping over the three or four other Stegner books I already had on my to-read list. It's about a union leader guy, not Stephen King's son.
  13. Doctor Zhivago by Boris Pasternak.
  14. Little Women by Louisa May Alcott.
  15. This Changes Everything by Naomi Klein. I'm thrilled but also a bit nervous to read this book on the topic of climate change vs. capitalism.
  16. Venturing into the prairies by Therese Jelinski.
  17. Reaper Man by Terry Pratchett.
  18. The Heat Seekers by Zane.
  19. The House of the Seven Gables and The Blithedale Romance and The Marble Faun by Nathaniel Hawthorne.
  20. Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco.
  21. A Distant Mirror by Barbara W. Tuchman.
  22. Rich Man, Poor Man and Beggarman, Thiefby Irwin Shaw. I only read the first of these two, but can guarantee I'm not interested in the second.
  23. Amber Chronicles 6-10 by Roger Zelazny.I've decided not to finish this series, and not to add it to my permanent collection. The style is just too different from the kind of thing that I love.
  24. The Portable James Joyce. Still just hanging onto this because it contains a copy of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, but also I think I might give Dubliners a shot. (Not shown cuz it's actually sitting behind the other books right now.)
The other books on the shelf are new ones that I've acquired since the beginning of the year and am not including in this year's reading plans, although I'd like to read Rage as my annual Stephen King summer book.

R39. The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson

Year Published: 1959
Pages: 235

First Sentence: No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream.

The Haunting of Hill House by Shirley Jackson | Two Hectobooks

Review:
It's taken a long time for me to get around to writing this review, so I almost decided to just not write it. But given that I already left it off of my year end wrap up for 2013 and how I really want to spread the word about this book, here we are after all. (And let me explain, since I am actually posting this in May of 2016: I originally read the book and wrote the review in late 2013/early 2014. I have… quite a backlog of Random books.)

The Haunting of Hill House is retroactively confusingly titled, thanks to the existence of the 1959 film House on Haunted Hill and its 1999 remake, which has nothing to do with it. The book actually inspired 1963's The Haunting, which I saw long ago and found ridiculous and, even more loosely, 1999's The Haunting remake, which I also saw long ago, this time while flirting with a boy.



Anyway, the book easily surpasses every single one of these movies in the creepy and super good departments. I'm not sure if I've ever read "The Lottery" or just know of it by reputation, but I feel like I can state with confidence that Shirley Jackson is a genius after having read just this one book.

Doctor Montague provides the impetus for the events of the novel. He wants to study spookiness, so he discovers Hill House and invites a group of people to spend several weeks of summer there with him. These people have all had some sort of experience with the unexplained. Most don't respond. The two who do: Eleanor Vance, who previously experienced a rain of stones on her home as a girl, and Theodora, a possibly-lesbian possible-psychic. Rounding out the quartet is young Luke Sanderson, a member of the family that owns the house.

Creepy things begin to happen almost instantly upon the characters' arrival at Hill House. It is a place of dreadful and oppressive silence (except at night), odd angles, clouded history, and doors that won't stay open. Eleanor is the true main character (other than the house, that is), a woman in her early 30s who has cared for her sick mother for eleven years, and is now shiftless, unwanted, and friendless. From the very beginning, the house gets her firmly in its clutches. The subtle ways the stress of the experience drives wedges between all of the characters are wonderful to behold as well.

There is so much good stuff in this book. There were parts of it that made my skin crawl, particularly when Eleanor first enters the house and the way her conversation with Mrs Dudley is immediately duplicated with Theodora. The interpersonal interactions are spectacular to read and so is the manipulation of Eleanor. Really the whole thing is just the best haunted house story I've ever read. I'm not sure that the geometric oddity of the house as described by Dr Montague is possible as written, but that's my only complaint and it's one I don't care about.

Read this book, but maybe do it in the daytime.

- - - - -
No human eye can isolate the unhappy coincidence of line and place which suggests evil in the face of a house, and yet somehow a maniac juxtaposition, a badly turned angle, some chance meeting of roof and sky, turned Hill House into a place of despair, more frightening because the face of Hill House seemed awake, with a watchfulness from the blank windows and a touch of glee in the eyebrow of a cornice.
- - - - -

What I'm Reading: Beyond Heaving Bosoms by Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan

As with A Natural History of the Romance Novel, I came to this book via a Goodreads comment about Tania Modleski's Loving with a Vengeance. Get ready for some raving this time, though.

Beyond Heaving Bosoms by Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan | Two Hectobooks

If I'm not mistaken, Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan are the co-founders of the blog Smart Bitches, Trashy Books (Tan doesn't seem to be around there anymore), which I don't really have the time or desire to read, because despite my interest in the genre, I'm not a fan and thus definitely not a part of the community. Anyway, this book is Wendell and Tan's snarky love letter to the romance genre, written by fans for... hard to say. I think other fans, but I found the book really funny and enlightening and I've been known to be a bit of a hater. Also, it's accessible in a way that Loving with a Vengeance and A Natural History of the Romance Novel really aren't.

The authors lampoon the "Old Skool" clichés of the genre with a lot of wit, and also deal with some of its seedier aspects (rape, in particular, which apparently was a mainstay for many years) with intelligence and aplomb. I learned a lot about romance and people who like it from this book. Basically: it's just a different kind of fantasy. Who would've thought!? (i.e. this should have been obvious all along, but here we are.) There are some cute sections at the end including romance novel Mad Libs and Choose-Your-Own-Adventure.

My one quibble is that sometimes the jokey aspects of the book got a bit out of hand. The word "come" was footnoted with the word "literally," like, five times too many for my liking. Other than that, though, I highly recommend this to anyone who's curious about the genre, and probably people who like it, too.

Five Years Ago This Month: May 2011

Five years ago this month...

...I reviewed The Adventures of Augie March. Overall I found it really boring and it hasn't stuck with me beyond a few bits that were truly great. At this point I feel cautiously optimistic about Henderson the Rain King, Saul Bellow's next book on The List.

...I wrote about bad internet connections. Because I was working in The North at the time, this was very much on my mind. This was around the time that most of the "early adopter" types of people I know were getting their first iPhones. Things have actually improved since then!

...I reviewed Camille. The fact is that I don't have very clear memories of this book beyond the plot summary that I just read in my original review. Armand was sure a dick.

May 2011 | Two Hectobooks
Ne touche pas!

What I'm Reading: We Band of Angels by Elizabeth M. Norman

Several years ago now, I read an a news post on The A.V. Club about yet another movie or miniseries about soldiers in the Second World War. Band of Brothers and The Pacific are both very much worth anyone's time, but many of the commenters mentioned how this WWII soldier story is maybe a bit overdone. They wanted to see more about the First World War instead, or maybe the Eastern Front. And then someone mentioned the story of the nurse POWs in the Philippines, and I added We Band of Angels to my reading list.

We Band of Angels by Elizabeth M. Norman | Two Hectobooks

As part of my efforts not to let anything languish on my to-read list for too long (hopefully this link works), I finally picked up the book, and yep, I'd totally love to see this movie.

More seriously: almost a hundred army and navy nurses were taken prisoner by the Japanese in the Philippines in 1942. These nurses went through combat and then through additional hell in internment camps. They were liberated in early 1945, and bore the scars of this experience for the rest of their lives. Elizabeth M. Norman interviewed twenty of the women, and used diary entries, letters, and other records and testimony to write her book about the so-called "Angels of Bataan."

I thought the book was great. I teared up a couple of times, because veterans bring tears to my eyes more reliably than anything else. My mom has been a nurse for most of my life, and nurses are definitely a special breed that I am not a part of. The kind of single woman who would (a) become a nurse, and (b) join the army in the first part of the 20th century is bound to be interesting and the only thing I could've wished for from this book is a bit more context about the social forces around these women as they became nurses and left for an unknown country.

Give this a read if you need a break from the brothers in arms storyline.

62. From Here to Eternity by James Jones

Year Published: 1951
Pages: 802
First Sentence: When he finished packing, he walked out on to the third-floor porch of the barracks brushing the dust from his hands, a very neat and deceptively slim young man in the summer khakis that were still early morning fresh.
Rating: 1/3 (don't bother)

From Here to Eternity by James Jones

Review:
I'm doing a rare thing and actually writing my review before I've finished the book.  I'm about fifteen pages away from done, so I do indeed plan to finish it, and will finish it, and will even make a footnote about it when I do*.  But I'm almost done and I've felt the same way about the book since I was less than fifty pages in to it as I do now, and after 787 pages I guarantee that there is absolutely nothing in those last fifteen that will change my mind.

From Here to Eternity is the longest book I've ever read, but not in terms of its page count.  I can't believe that anyone else has ever read it, much less that it was a huge hit when it was published.  If not for this project, I would have given up early on.

A little less than a year before the attack on Pearl Harbor, Robert E. Lee Prewitt, a US Army bugler, is transferred into G Company, possibly because he's being sexually harassed by a superior officer, but I wasn't really clear on that.  He can't bugle anymore and his company commander wants him to box, but he doesn't want to do that, either.  The book then drags on for over six hundred pages about what happens to Prew in G Company (he receives "The Treatment"), and also the first sergeant of that company, Milt Warden, who's having an affair with the company commander's wife.  Don't ask me which of those terms should be capitalized because I don't know.  They are all at the Schofield Barracks in Hawaii, by the way, and obviously this is all before America got into WWII.  Jones actually was in Hawaii at the time when this book is set, and the thing only comes alive during the description of the attack.

I'd describe more of the events of the book, but it's just super boring.  Before I complain even more, I'll say that I don't recommend this except to people who are super super keen about the military.  Not even those who are super keen about WWII.  This is just about army life on a tropical island.

The first problem is the book's relentless detail about not much.  I think I've mentioned that I wasn't a big fan of The Lord of the Rings, and one of the main reasons for that was excessive detail.  Both books are detailed this way for obvious reasons: Tolkien is creating a world with as much texture as he's able, and James Jones is describing a unique and bizarre period in the existence of the US Army, and really really really giving us a feel for the lives of these men.  Jones is an even worse writer than Tolkien, though, and I'm a person who is just not interested in this level of detail from either of them.

So yeah, that's the second problem: James Jones is not a good writer.  I can't tell if he's a bad writer because a lot of the worst things about this book seem intentional and so at least he was thinking about his writing, I guess?  But, like, this is a writer who strings adverbs.  "James Jones wrote relentlessly egregiously" is a sentence that you would find in this book.  He uses the word "grin" a lot, and he repeats things.  Another weird thing he does is leave off the apostrophes in many contracted words, like "dont," but keeps them in others, like "I'll."  This is done almost without rhyme or reason except that I think the apostrophes are retained where necessary for legibility.  Mostly.

To give Jones some credit, he did sneak in some stuff that intrigued me, although he of course flogged it beyond any interest I had.  The book is full of gay people, at least compared to most of the other List books so far (and probably to come), in a way that I didn't even really understand.  I think what happens in the book is that soldiers are stringing along gay men for cash, but I can't tell whether they're having sex with them or not, because I'm kind of dumb about the allusions that Jones is presumably making.  That's a pretty startling kettle of fish to be getting into in a book from this era. I can't really think of anything else that depicts men in the US Army circa WWII as anything other than fresh-faced and straight.


The female characters in the book are also more complex than you'd expect.  Prew is paired with a prostitute named Alma (who works under the name Lorene).  They are in love, but she goes on working at the brothel where he met her throughout their relationship.  She's working there as a way to save up for her future back on the mainland.  The book never really questions this or frowns upon her.  Warden's love interest is, as I mentioned, the company commander's wife, Karen Holmes.  After getting some STD from her husband, who of course was sleeping around, she ends up having a hysterectomy, and by the time Warden meets her she's feeling sterile and, dare I say, frigid.  Their whole relationship seems shitty to me, and they never seem happy together, so I don't get that.  But again, I don't feel as if the book really judges Karen Holmes for stepping out on her husband.

But this stuff is all just diamonds in the rough.  There's some racial and class commentary, some police and prison brutality, and on and on, but the problem is that the book goes on and on for so long that I didn't care about any of the good stuff because there'd be 75 pages of the boring stuff before more good stuff came around again, just briefly.

There's a star studded movie adaptation of this book that came out two years after the book was published, is only two hours long, and won a whole bunch of Academy Awards.  I'm going to have to recommend watching that instead of reading this book, even though I haven't seen it.

* I finished it.

- - - - -
But he had always believed in fighting for the underdog against the top dog. He had learned it, not from The Home, or The School, or The Church, but from that fourth and other great moulder of social conscience, The Movies.
- - - - -
Karen laughed and it was like honey dripping from a spoon back into the jar between you and the sunlight.
- - - - -
Bad things, Prew thought, were never quite so bad, if you could force somebody you knew and liked to suffer them with you. Usually you couldn't; they were too busy suffering something themselves and trying to force you to suffer it with them. But if you could, it helped thin that sense of seeing the whole damned world move past you on the corner without knowing you were standing there. Of course, it was hard on the friends. You hated to see them suffer.
- - - - -