Showing posts with label Author: Fitzgerald (F. Scott). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Author: Fitzgerald (F. Scott). Show all posts

2. The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald

Year Published: 1926
Pages: 140
First Sentence: In my younger and more vulnerable years my father gave me some advice that I’ve been turning over in my mind ever since.
Rating: 2/3 (meh)


Review:
I promise that I'm not giving The Great Gatsby a middling rating just to be edgy.

In twenty or so years of reading adult fiction, I'd somehow managed to never read The Great Gatsby before now, and also never had the plot spoiled, either. The book is narrated by a young man named Nick Carraway, who's left his midwestern town to live in New York and sell bonds. Over the course of one heady Jazz Age summer, Nick becomes involved with his wealthy neighbours. There are his cousin Daisy Buchanan and her husband Tom, and then a mysterious figure named Jay Gatsby. Gatsby's in love with Daisy, and over the course of the novel we and Nick discover how the two of them came to know each other, and what eventually happens between them.

This book had a few things working against it.

First and worst of all was my other F. Scott Fitzgerald reading experience with Tender Is the Night, a book I didn't like, that felt like a complete chore to read despite its relatively short length. I am pleased to report that, previous experience notwithstanding, The Great Gatsby is not only readable but easily readable. Having Nick Carraway for a charming, personable narrator with a sense of humour is far preferable to the third person narration of Tender Is the Night. Plus, the prose in The Great Gatsby sparkles in a way that it can't have done in the other book, because I feel like I would've remembered it.

The other point against The Great Gatsby is my high expectations, which rarely bode well. The Great Gatsby has one of the biggest reputations in literature, and so I couldn't avoid getting my hopes up, but I don't know how a book can live up to the reputation this one has. I went in to this expecting to have my socks knocked off and my jaw dropped and neither of those things happened. The book is by no means a bad one, and actually I liked it, but I have no plans to read it again the way I do for several other books on The List.

Finally, I'm just so tired of The List and everything it stands for in terms of 20th century literature and my own reading, and apathy is probably worse than hostility when it comes to a book like this. No list enumerating the greatest published works of an entire century would ever be complete listing only one hundred of those works (even if you only pick one language), but I'm so ready to choose my own reading material again.

What I'm wondering right now is whether The Great Gatsby is going to stick with me or not. Again, I like this book and I think there was good stuff in it. The characters are well-developed and Nick is a likeable narrator. The themes of ambition and corruption and shallowness are still important today. But without that gut punch that I look for when calling a book truly great, I just don't think I want to be someone else adding my voice to the superlative praise of this book.

The Great Gatsby isn't bad and it won't take you long to read it. But you might want to try something less well-known instead.
- - - - -
'Look here, old sport,' he broke out surprisingly, 'what's your opinion of me, anyhow?' 
A little overwhelmed, I began the generalized evasions which that question deserves.
- - - - -

28. Tender Is the Night by F. Scott Fitzgerald

Year Published: 1934
Pages: 313
First Sentence: On the pleasant shore of the French Riviera, about half way between Marseilles and the Italian border, stands a large, proud, rose-colored hotel.
Rating: 1/3 (don't bother)

Tender Is the Night by F. Scott Fitzgerald | Two Hectobooks

Review:
Full disclosure, first of all. I got Tender Is the Night from the library, and for some reason, the copy they gave me smelled like it was drenched in perfume. Although I suppose there are worse things that a library book could smell like, this nevertheless had a negative physiological impact on my reading experience for this book.

Full disclosure, part deux. About halfway or two thirds of the way through reading this, I got curious and decided to read Zelda Fitzgerald's wikipedia page, given that she was famously mentally unstable and I thought perhaps there was a bit of her in Nicole. Whereupon I discovered that F. Scott Fitzgerald was a total ass to her when it came to this book and her own, Save Me the Waltz. So, I hadn't been on his side since about twenty pages in to the novel, but that really made me angry.

The book also suffers from the fact that it's very boring and self-indulgent.

I have never read any of Fitzgerald's work before, although of course The Great Gatsby is sitting there up in second place on The List and I'm honestly still looking forward to it. But Tender Is the Night may be evidence that I shouldn't go looking beyond Gatsby when I eventually get there.

So anyway, this is about Dick and Nicole Diver. They are the ubiquitous Rich Americans in Europe*. If you read the first hundred pages of this book, though, you'd probably think that it was about young movie star Rosemary Hoyt and her mommy issues, but you'd be gravely mistaken. Dick is a psychologist or psychiatrist or whatever the name for a doctor dealing with mental illness was in the 20s and 30s. Nicole is his young patient, whose horrifying backstory drops like a bomb somewhere in the middle of the book.

I'm not going to tell you anything that happens, because it's all pointless and you can probably guess it anyway. There's stuff about Dick and Nicole's relationship, how they got together and how they grow apart. There's drinking and carousing in Paris. If your book has a young movie star in it then probably the male lead will eventually have sex with her. Blah blah blah.

I thought this book would be a quick read but it was endless and so silly. At least with my previous 1/3 (The Golden Bowl, also a Rich Americans in Europe book, incidentally), I thought the story should've been interesting but I just didn't know what was going on most of the time**. In the case of Tender Is the Night I suppose the characters are all fine (Dick could have been a self-insert character who is forgiven everything, but he isn't, so that's good at least) and the prose even trends to very good in places, but that's simply not good enough for #28 on The List.

* I should compile all the books on The List that feature Rich Americans in Europe, because you probably don't really need to bother with any of them, to be honest.

** And it's at this point that I'll note: man, The List and I have been having such a good run lately!

- - - - -
"My God," he gasped, "you're fun to kiss."
- - - - -
He saw that no provision had been made for him, or for Nicole, in Mrs. Speers' plans—and he saw that her amorality sprang from the conditions of her own withdrawal. It was her right, the pension on which her own emotions had retired. Women are necessarily capable of almost anything in their struggle for survival and can scarcely be convicted of such manmade crimes as "cruelty."
- - - - -